Сделать домашней страницей | Добавить в избранное
База RFC-документов




Request for Comments number 2077

Главная / RFC2077

Поиск RFC:

RFC2077 The Model Primary Content Type for Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions

RFC2077   The Model Primary Content Type for Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions    S. Nelson, C. Parks, Mitra [ January 1997 ] ( TXT = 30158 bytes)

Скачать PDF версию >>>

Network Working Group                                        S. Nelson
Request for Comments: 2077                                        LLNL
Category: Standards Track                                     C. Parks
                                                          January 1997

                   The Model Primary Content Type for
                 Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.


   The purpose of this memo is to propose an update to Internet RFC 2045
   to include a new primary content-type to be known as "model". RFC
   2045 [1] describes mechanisms for specifying and describing the
   format of Internet Message Bodies via content-type/subtype pairs. We
   believe that "model" defines a fundamental type of content with
   unique presentational, hardware, and processing aspects.  Various
   subtypes of this primary type are immediately anticipated but will be
   covered under separate documents.

Table of Contents

      1. Overview.............................................  2
      2. Definition...........................................  2
      3. Consultation Mechanisms..............................  4
      4. Encoding and Transport...............................  5
      5. Security Considerations Section......................  6
      6. Authors' Addresses...................................  7
      7. Expected subtypes....................................  7
      8. Appendix.............................................  9
      9. Acknowledgements..................................... 13

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 1]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

1. Overview

   This document will outline what a model is, show examples of models,
   and discuss the benefits of grouping models together.  This document
   will not directly deal with the intended subtypes since those will be
   covered by their separate registrations.  Some immediately expected
   subtypes are listed in section 7.

   This document is a discussion document for an agreed definition,
   intended eventually to form a standard accepted extension to RFC
   2045.  We are also targeting developers of input/output filters,
   viewer software and hardware, those involved in MIME transport, and

2. Definition of a model

   A model primary MIME type is an electronically exchangeable
   behavioral or physical representation within a given domain.  Each
   subtype in the model structure has unique features, just as does each
   subtype in the other primary types.  The important fact is that these
   various subtypes can be converted between each other with less loss
   of information then to that of other primary types.  This fact groups
   these subtypes together into the model primary type.  All of the
   expected subtypes have several features in common and that are unique
   to this primary type.

   To loosely summarize: models are multidimensional structures composed
   of one or more objects.  If there are multiple objects then one
   object defines the arrangement/setting/relationship of the others.
   These objects all have calibrated coordinate systems but these
   systems need not be in the same units nor need they have the same
   dimensionality.  In detail:

   1. have 3 or more dimensions which are bases of the system and
      form an orthogonal system (any orthogonal system is sufficient).

      This system is specifically defined in terms of an orthogonal
      set of basis functions [for a subspace of the L^2 function space]
      over a coordinate system of dimension 3 or more. Note that this
      does not preclude regular skewed systems, elliptical coordinates,
      different vector spaces, etc.

   2. contain a structural relationship between model elements.

   3. have scaling or calibration factors which are related to physical
      units (force, momentum, time, velocity, acceleration, size, etc.).
      Thus, an IGES file will specify a building of non-arbitrary size,
      computational meshes and VRML models will have real spatial/

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 2]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

      temporal units. This allows for differing elements to be combined

   4. Models can be single objects or composed of a collection of
      objects.  These normally independent objects are arranged
      in a master/slave scenario so that one object acts as the
      reference, or primary object, which defines how the other
      objects interrelate and behave.  This allows for the creation
      of mathematical, physical, economic, behavioral, etc. models
      which typically are composed of different elements.  The key is
      in the description: these types describe how something
      "behaves"; contrasted to typical data types which describe
      how something "is".

      The inclusion of this "collective" system works similar to the
      Email system's multipart/related type which defines the actions
      of the individual parts.  Further specification of the model/*
      subtypes utilizing these properties is left to the subtype

   With these assumptions:

   a. the default dimensionality will be spatial and temporal (but
      any are allowed).

   b. it is presumed that models will contain underlying structure
      which may or may not be immediately available to the
      user. (fluid dynamics vector fields, electromagnetic
      propagation, interrelated IGES dimensional specifiers, VRML
      materials and operators, etc.)

   c. it is assumed that basis set conversion between model domains
      is lossless.  The interpretation of the data may change but
      the specification will not.  i.e. convert the model of the
      U.S.A.  Gross Domestic Product into a VRML model and navigate
      it to explore the variances and interrelationships.  The model
      has many dimensions but also "passages" and "corridors"
      linking different parts of it.  A similar situation is true
      for meshes and CAD files. The key is identifying the basis set
      conversion which makes sense.

   d. models are grouped to assure LESS loss of information between
      the model subtypes than to subtypes of other primary
      types. (i.e.  converting a chemical model into an image is
      more lossy than concerting it into a VRML model).

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 3]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

   Items c and d above define the grouping for model similar to the way
   that "images" and "videos" are grouped together; to assure less loss
   of information.  Obviously converting from a GIF image to a JPEG
   image looses less information than converting from a GIF image to an
   AU audio file.

3.  Consultation Mechanisms

   Before proposing a subtype for the model/* primary type, it is
   suggested that the subtype author examine the definition (above) of
   what a model/* is and the listing (below) of what a model/* is not.
   Additional consultations with the authors of the existing model/*
   subtypes is also suggested.

   Copies of RFCs are available on:


   Copies of Internet-Drafts are available on:


   Similarly, the VRML discussion list has been archived as:


   and discussions on the comp.mail.mime group may be of interest.
   Discussion digests for the existing model/* subtypes may be
   referenced in the respective documents.

   The mesh community presently has numerous different mesh geometries
   as part of different packages.  Freely available libraries need to be
   advertised more than they have been in the past to spur the
   development of interoperable packages.  It is hoped that by following
   the example of the VRML community and creating a freely available
   comprehensive library of input/output functions for meshes [11] that
   this problem will be alleviated for the mesh community.  A freely
   available mesh viewer conforming to these standards is available now
   for various platforms.  Consulations with the authors of the mesh


   will be beneficial.

   The IGES community has a suite of tests and conformance utilities to
   gauge the conformance to specifications and software authors are
   encouraged to seek those out from NIST [14].

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 4]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

4. Encoding and Transport

   a. Unrecognized subtypes of model should at a minimum be treated
      as "application/octet-stream".  Implementations may optionally
      elect to pass subtypes of model that they do not specifically
      recognize to a robust general-purpose model viewing
      application, if such an application is available.

   b. Different subtypes of model may be encoded as textual
      representations or as binary data.  Unless noted in the
      subtype registration, subtypes of model should be assumed to
      contain binary data, implying a content encoding of base64 for
      email and binary transfer for ftp and http.

   c. The formal syntax for the subtypes of the model primary type
      should look like this:

      Media type name:          model
      Media subtype name:       xxxxxxxx
      Required parameters:      none
      Optional parameters:      dimensionality, state
                                (see below)
      Encoding considerations:  base64 encoding is recommended when
                                transmitting model/* documents through
                                MIME electronic mail.
      Security considerations:  see section 5 below
      Published specification:  This document.
                                See Appendix B for references to some of
                                the expected subtypes.
      Person and email address to contact for further information:
                                Scott D. Nelson <nelson18@llnl.gov>
                                7000 East Ave.
                                Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
                                Livermore, CA  94550

   The optional parameters consist of starting conditions and variable
   values used as part of the subtypes.  A base set is listed here for
   illustration purposes only and will be covered in detail as part of
   the respective subtypes:

  dimension := string ; a number indicating the number of dimensions.
                        This is used as a "hint" in selecting
                        applicable viewer programs.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 5]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

  state     := string ; "static" or "dynamic".  In "static", the
                        observer may move about, thus effecting
                        translations, rotations, pans, zooms, etc.
                        but the data does not change.  In "dynamic",
                        the data itself is manipulated via
                        skews, elongations, scales, etc.  Note that
                        time evolution is still a static operation
                        since it is just a translation along one of
                        the principal dimensions while the elongation
                        of a cube or object deformation are dynamic

      Note that this optional parameter list does not limit those
      specified by the various subtypes.

   d. The specific issues relating to the various subtypes are covered
      as part of the description of those specific subtypes.  The
      following is an example of a typical MIME header used for mail
      transport purposes:

         To:   you@some.org
         From: nelson18@llnl.gov
         Date: Fri, 30 Aug 96 13:33:19 -0700
         Content-Type: model/mesh; dimension="4"; state="static"
         Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
         MIME-Version: 1.0
         Subject: model data file


5.  Security Considerations Section

   Note that the data files are "read-only" and do not contain file
   system modifiers or batch/macro commands.  The transported data is
   not self-modifying but may contain interrelationships.  The data
   files may however contain a "default view" which is added by the
   author at file creation time.  This "default view" may manipulate
   viewer variables, default look angle, lighting, visualization
   options, etc.  This visualization may also involve the computation of
   variables or values for display based on the given raw data.  For
   motorized equipment, this may change the position from the hardware's
   rest state to the object's starting orientation.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 6]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

   The internal structure of the data files may direct agents to access
   additional data from the network (i.e. inclusions); the security
   limits of whom are not pre-supposed.  Actions based on these
   inclusions are left to the security definitions of the inclusions.
   Further comments about the security considerations for the subtypes
   will be contained in each subtype's registration.

6. Authors' Addresses

      S. D. Nelson
      Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
      7000 East Ave., L-153,
      Livermore CA 94550, USA.
      E-Mail: nelson18@llnl.gov

      C. Parks
      National Institute of Standards & Technology
      Bldg 220, Room B-344
      Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
      E-Mail: parks@eeel.nist.gov

      1056 Noe
      San Francisco, CA 94114
      E-Mail: mitra@earth.path.net

7. Expected subtypes

   Table 1 lists some of the expected model sub-type names.  Suggested 3
   letter extensions are also provided for DOS compatibility but their
   need is hopefully diminished by the use of more robust operating
   systems on PC platforms.  The "silo" extension is provided for
   backwards compatibility.  Mesh has an extensive list of hints since
   the present variability is so great.  In the future, the need for
   these hints will diminish since the files are self describing.  This
   document is not registering these subtypes.  They will be handled
   under separate documents.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 7]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

Table 1.

   Primary/sub-type           Suggested extension(s)    Reference

   model/iges                         igs,iges              [8]
   model/vrml                         wrl                   [9]
   model/mesh                         msh, mesh, silo       [10]

   It is expected that model/mesh will also make use of a number of
   parameters which will help the end user determine the data type
   without examine the data.  However, note that mesh files are self-

      regular+static, unstructed+static, unstructured+dynamic,
      conformal+static, conformal+dynamic, isoparametric+static,

   The sub-types listed above are some of the anticipated types that are
   already in use.  Notice that the IGES type is already registered as
   "application/iges" and that RFC states that a more appropriate type
   is desired.  Note that the author of "application/iges" is one of the
   authors of this "model" submission and application/iges will be re-
   registered as model/iges at the appropriate time.

   The VRML type is gaining wide acceptance and has numerous parallel
   development efforts for different platforms.  These efforts are
   fueled by the release of the QvLib library for reading VRML files;
   without which the VRML effort would be less further along.  This has
   allowed for a consistent data type and has by defacto established a
   set of standards. Further VRML efforts include interfaces to other
   kinds of hardware (beyond just visual displays) and it is proposed by
   those involved in the VRML effort to encompass more of the five
   senses.  Unlike other kinds of "reality modeling" schemes, VRML is
   not proprietary to any one vendor and should experience similar
   growth as do other open standards.

   The mesh type is an offshoot of existing computational meshing
   efforts and, like VRML, builds on a freely available library set.
   Also like VRML, there are other proprietary meshing systems but there
   are converters which will convert from those closed systems to the
   mesh type.  Meshes in general have an association feature so that the
   connectivity between nodes is maintained.  It should be noted that
   most modern meshes are derived from CAD solids files.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 8]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

8. Appendices

8.1 Appendix A -- extraneous details about expected subtypes

 VRML Data Types

   The 3D modeling and CAD communities use a number of file formats to
   represent 3D models, these formats are widely used to exchange
   information, and full, or lossy, converters between the formats exist
   both independently and integrated into widely used applications. The
   VRML format is rapidly becoming a standard for the display of 3D
   information on the WWW.

 Mesh Data Types

   For many decades, finite element and finite difference time domain
   codes have generated mesh structures which attempt to use the
   physical geometry of the structures in connection with various
   physics packages to generate real world simulations of events
   including electromagnetic wave propagation, fluid dynamics, motor
   design, etc.  The resulting output data is then post processed to
   examine the results in a variety of forms.  This proposed mesh
   subtype will include both geometry and scalar/vector/tensor results
   data.  An important point to note is that many modern meshes are
   generated from solids constructed using CAD packages.

   Motivation for mesh grew out of discussions with other communities
   about their design requirements.  Many CAD or scene descriptions are
   composed of a small number of complex objects while computational
   meshes are composed of large numbers of simple objects.  A 1,000,000
   element 3D mesh is small.  A 100,000,000 element 3D structured mesh
   is large.  Each object can also have an arbitrary amount of
   associated data and the mesh connectivity information is important in
   optimizing usage of the mesh.  Also, the mesh itself is usually
   uninteresting but postprocessing packages may act on the underlying
   data or a computational engine may process the data as input.

   Meshes differ principally from other kinds of scenes in that meshes
   are composed of a large number of simple objects which may contain
   arbitrary non-spatial parameters, not all of whom need be visible,
   and who have an implicit connectivity and neighbor list.  This latter
   point is the key feature of a mesh. It should be noted that most
   meshes are generated from CAD files however.  The mesh type has
   association functions because the underlying physics was used to
   calculate the interaction (if you crash a car into a telephone pole,
   you get a crumpled car and a bent pole).  Most interesting
   computational meshes are 4D with additional multidimensional results

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                     [Page 9]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

 IGES CAD Data Types

   (The following text, reproduced for reference purposes only, is from
   "U.S. Product Data Association and IGES/PDES Organization Reference
   Manual," June 1995; by permission.)

   IGES, the Initial Graphics Exchange Specification, defines a neutral
   data format that allows for the digital exchange of information among
   computer-aided design (CAD) systems.

   CAD systems are in use today in increasing numbers for applications
   in all phases of the design, analysis, and manufacture and testing of
   products. Since the designer may use one supplier's system while the
   contractor and subcontractor may use other systems, there is a need
   to be able to exchange data digitally among all CAD systems.

   The databases of CAD systems from different vendors often represent
   the same CAD constructs differently. A circular arc on one system may
   be defined by a center point, its starting point and end point, while
   on another it is defined by its center, its diameter starting and
   ending angle. IGES enables the exchange of such data by providing, in
   the public domain, a neutral definition and format for the exchange
   of such data.

   Using IGES, the user can exchange product data models in the form of
   wireframe, surface, or solid representations as well as surface
   representations. Translators convert a vendor's proprietary internal
   database format into the neutral IGES format and from the IGES format
   into another vendor's internal database. The translators, called pre-
   and post-processors, are usually available from vendors as part of
   their product lines.

   Applications supported by IGES include traditional engineering
   drawings as well as models for analysis and/or various manufacturing
   functions. In addition to the general specification, IGES also
   includes application protocols in which the standard is interpreted
   to meet discipline specific requirements.

   IGES technology assumes that a person is available on the receiving
   end to interpret the meaning of the product model data. For instance,
   a person is needed to determine how many holes are in the part
   because the hole itself is not defined. It is represented in IGES by
   its component geometry and therefore, is indistinguishable from the
   circular edges of a rod.

   The IGES format has been registered with the Internet Assigned
   Numbers Authority (IANA) as a Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension
   (MIME) type "application/iges". The use of the message type/subtype

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                    [Page 10]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

   in Internet messages facilitates the uniform recognition of an IGES
   file for routing to a viewer or translator.

   Version 1.0 of the specification was adopted as an American National
   Standards (ANS Y14.26M-1981) in November of 1981. Versions 3.0 and
   4.0 of the specification have subsequently been approved by ANSI. The
   current version of IGES 5.2 was approved by ANSI under the new
   guidelines of the U.S. Product Data Association. Under these
   guidelines, the IGES/PDES Organization (IPO) became the accredited
   standards body for product data exchange standards. This latest
   standard is USPRO/IPO-100-1993.

8.2 Appendix B -- References and Citations

   [1] Freed, N., and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
   Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies", RFC
   2045, Innosoft, First Virtual, November 1996.

   [2] Fitzgerald P., "Molecules-R-Us Interface to the Brookhaven Data
   Base", Computational Molecular Biology Section, National Institutes
   of Health, USA; see http://www.nih.gov/htbin/pdb for further details;
   Peitsch M.C, Wells T.N.C., Stampf D.R., Sussman S. J., "The Swiss-3D
   Image Collection And PDP-Browser On The Worldwide Web", Trends In
   Biochemical Sciences, 1995, 20, 82.

   [3] "Proceedings of the First Electronic Computational Chemistry
   Conference", Eds. Bachrach, S. M., Boyd D. B., Gray S. K, Hase W.,
   Rzepa H.S, ARInternet: Landover, Nov. 7- Dec. 2, 1994, in press;
   Bachrach S. M, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 1995, in press.

   [4] Richardson D.C., and Richardson J.S., Protein Science, 1992, 1,
   3; D. C. Richardson D. C., and Richardson J.S., Trends in Biochem.
   Sci.,1994, 19, 135.

   [5] Rzepa H. S., Whitaker B. J., and Winter M. J., "Chemical
   Applications of the World-Wide-Web", J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
   1994, 1907; Casher O., Chandramohan G., Hargreaves M., Murray-Rust
   P., Sayle R., Rzepa H.S., and Whitaker B. J., "Hyperactive Molecules
   and the World-Wide-Web Information System", J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
   Trans 2, 1995, 7; Baggott J., "Biochemistry On The Web", Chemical &
   Engineering News, 1995, 73, 36; Schwartz A.T, Bunce D.M, Silberman
   R.G, Stanitski C.L, Stratton W.J, Zipp A.P, "Chemistry In Context -
   Weaving The Web", Journal Of Chemical Education, 1994, 71, 1041.

   [6] Rzepa H.S., "WWW94 Chemistry Workshop", Computer Networks and
   ISDN Systems, 1994, 27, 317 and 328.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                    [Page 11]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

   [7] S.D. Nelson, "Email MIME test page", Lawrence Livermore National
   Laboratory, 1994. See http://www-dsed.llnl.gov/documents/WWWtest.html
   and http://www-dsed.llnl.gov/documents/tests/email.html

   [8] C. Parks, "Registration of new Media Type application/iges",
   application/iges, 1995.

   [9] G. Bell, A. Parisi, M. Pesce, "The Virtual Reality Modeling
   http://sdsc.edu/SDSC/Partners/vrml/Archives/vrml10-3.html, 1995.

   [10] S.D. Nelson, "Registration of new Media Type model/mesh",
   mesh, 1997.

   [11] "SILO User's Guide", Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
   University of California, UCRL-MA-118751, March 7, 1995,

   [12] E. Brugger, "Mesh-TV: a graphical analysis tool", Lawrence
   Livermore National Laboratory, University of California,
   UCRL-TB-115079-8, http://www.llnl.gov/liv_comp/meshtv/mesh.html

   [13] S. Brown, "Portable Application Code Toolkit (PACT)", the
   printed documentation is accessible from the PACT Home Page

   [14] L. Rosenthal, "Initial Graphics Exchange Specification
   (IGES) Test Service",

8.3 Appendix C -- hardware

   Numerous kinds of hardware already exist which can process some of
   the expected model data types and are listed here for illustration
   purposes only:

      stereo glasses, 3D lithography machines, automated manufacturing
      systems, data gloves (with feedback), milling machines,
      aromascopes, treadmills.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                    [Page 12]
RFC 2077                Model Primary MIME Types            January 1997

8.4 Appendix D -- Examples

   This section contains a collection of various pointers to examples of
   what the model type encompasses:

   Example mesh model objects can be found on this mesh page:

   Various IGES compliant test objects:

   VRML Test Suite:

   An image of a model of a shipping cage crashing into the ground:

   An image of a 100,000,000 zone mesh:

   A video of a seismic wave propagation through a computational mesh:

9. Acknowledgements

   Thanks go to Henry Rzepa (h.rzepa@ic.ac.uk), Peter Murray-Rust
   (pmr1716@ggr.co.uk), Benjamin Whitaker
   (B.J.Whitaker@chemistry.leeds.ac.uk), Bill Ross (ross@cgl.ucsf.EDU),
   and others in the chemical community on which the initial draft of
   this document is based.  That document updated an IETF Internet Draft
   in which the initial chemical submission was made, incorporated
   suggestions received during the subsequent discussion period, and
   indicated scientific support for and uptake of a higher level
   document incorporating physical sciences[2-7].  This Model submission
   benefited greatly from the previous groundwork laid, and the
   continued interest by, those communities.

   The authors would additionally like to thank Keith Moore
   (moore@cs.utk.edu), lilley (lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk), Wilson Ross
   (ross@cgl.ucsf.EDU), hansen (hansen@pegasus.att.com), Alfred Gilman
   (asg@severn.wash.inmet.com), and Jan Hardenbergh (jch@nell.oki.com)
   without which this document would not have been possible.  Additional
   thanks go to Mark Crispin (MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU) for his comments
   on the previous version and Cynthia Clark (cclark@ietf.org) for
   editing the submitted versions.

Nelson, et. al.             Standards Track                    [Page 13]



Анализ сайта
Rambler's Top100
Render time: 0.027492046356201 sec